From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Additional index entries and table sorting |
Date: | 2010-11-23 22:05:26 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinCUzMCHTQum-DFL6P-Gswn0q5G79QeLnpaCKFj@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On 23 November 2010 22:04, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On fre, 2010-11-05 at 22:33 +0000, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 28 October 2010 20:15, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> >
>> > It was already inconsistent in the SGML, but if you wish, I'll redo it so
>> > that they're all in tables. That will mean taking the sections which kept
>> > index terms outside of tables already, and merging them with all the tables.
>> > Will take me a while.
>>
>>
>> Okay, here's another version, moving index entries back from separate lists
>> into function tables, although I think I've done that for more than just my
>> own changes.
>
> Committed
Thanks Peter! :)
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-11-24 23:42:17 | documention of checkpoints with file system snapshots |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-11-23 22:04:23 | Re: Additional index entries and table sorting |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2010-11-23 22:45:51 | Re: Horizontal Write Scaling |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-11-23 22:04:23 | Re: Additional index entries and table sorting |