Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Divakar Singh <dpsmails(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
Date: 2010-10-25 18:26:27
Message-ID: AANLkTinB1yN0u61EGceCXq6Tjp+RuQ0-JDRp5usZAfWp@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Divakar Singh <dpsmails(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello Experts,
> My application uses Oracle DB, and makes use of OCI interface.
> I have been able to develop similar interface using postgreSQL library.
> However, I have done some tests but results for PostgreSQL have not been
> encouraging for a few of them.

Tell us more about your tests and results please.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Divakar SinghDate: 2010-10-25 18:31:22
Subject: Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
Previous:From: André VolpatoDate: 2010-10-25 18:21:34
Subject: AIX slow buffer reads

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2010-10-25 18:27:29
Subject: Re: Range Types, discrete and/or continuous
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2010-10-25 18:20:33
Subject: Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group