Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies
Date: 2011-02-26 05:09:31
Message-ID: AANLkTin90SzUJdPFTt=ptKLDhNJv-afxsQVmJoNZRueC@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> writes:
>> On 2011-02-24 5:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Oh, did we decide to do it that way?  OK with me, but the submitted docs
>>> are woefully inadequate on the point.  This behavior is going to have to
>>> be explained extremely clearly (and even so, I bet we'll get bug reports
>>> about it :-().
>
>> I'm ready to put more effort into the documentation if the patch is
>> going in, but I really don't want to waste my time just to hear that the
>> patch is not going to be in 9.1.  Does this sound acceptable?
>
> I've found some things I don't like about it, but the only part that
> seems far short of being committable is the documentation.

Tom/Alvaro, have the two of you hammered out who is going to finish
this one off?  I *believe* Alvaro told me on IM that he was leaving
this one for Tom.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-02-26 05:10:52
Subject: Re: pl/python tracebacks
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-02-26 05:07:40
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL FDW update

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group