On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 16:24, Mike Ellsworth <younicycle(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> We already have such a section on the main website, I suggest we keep
>>> just one. If a vendor wants a wiki, they can use their own wiki - and
>>> link it from our main website.
>> lost me on this. I think you're suggesting Vendors set up wiki
>> software for one page on their own site. Instead, I think it makes
>> more sense for vendors to have a link from their own site - to the PG
>> wiki. Maybe I misunderstand.
> To clarify what I'm suggesting - I'm suggesting vendors set up a page
> about their own product somewhere on their own site, be it a wiki or
> something else. If they don't have one, on a simple google site or
> even a github wiki.
> postgresql.org will then link to this from our product catalogue,
> which is on the website, just like we do for other commercial
> products. That way we (the project) provide equal level of visibility
> for third party software, and it's entirely up to the vendor exactly
> what type of information to keep on the page/wiki.
> So basically the same thing, except I think the vendor should keep
> their info and postgresql link to it, rather than the other way
> Magnus Hagander
> Me: http://www.hagander.net/
> Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
As long as there would be room for a 120 char description, sounds great to me.
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2011-02-26 19:53:18|
|Subject: Re: RFC: Hosting mailing lists of 3rd party projects|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2011-02-26 15:31:30|
|Subject: Re: Wiki clarification|