Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache
Date: 2010-06-29 10:52:10
Message-ID: AANLkTin2nrHGAjLhP-E6TXmiCUMTu1nwbbJjM3mdCWkI@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> The patch also documents that synchronous_commit = false has
>> potential committed transaction loss from a database crash (as well as
>> an OS crash).

Is this actually true?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergio Charpinel Jr. 2010-06-29 11:59:37 Re: Low perfomance SUM and Group by large databse
Previous Message Sachin Kumar 2010-06-29 07:01:18 Performance issues with postgresql-8.4.0