Re: [RRR] CommitFest 2010-07 final report

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [RRR] CommitFest 2010-07 final report
Date: 2010-09-13 12:00:16
Message-ID: AANLkTin2ES4qWT9iNnjQhfOV9tJ971cOirrWF0GFCm5R@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> So did the materialized views patch not get submitted?

I think someone else will need to pick it up and do a bunch more work
with it before it can be considered a serious candidate for commit.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-09-13 12:13:10 Re: Reducing walreceiver latency with a latch
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-09-13 11:57:42 Re: update on global temporary and unlogged tables

Browse pgsql-rrreviewers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hitoshi Harada 2010-09-13 13:15:24 top-level DML under CTEs
Previous Message Thom Brown 2010-09-13 11:44:38 Re: [RRR] CommitFest 2010-07 final report