Re: exposing COPY API

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: exposing COPY API
Date: 2011-02-08 13:49:36
Message-ID: AANLkTin0__cXY-uqjLQuFauuSuEZxGV7UC1EzGPTzWjw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Shigeru HANADA
<hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 17:49:09 +0900
> Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 09:38, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> > Here is a patch against the latest revision of file_fdw to exercise this
>> > API. It includes some regression tests, and I think apart from one or two
>> > small details plus a requirement for documentation, is complete.
>>
>> The patch contains a few fixes for typo in the original patch.
>> Hanada-san, could you take them into the core file_fdw patch?
>
> Thanks, I've applied to my local repo.
>
> s/Centinel/Sentinel/
> s/Vaidate/Validate/
> s/reaind/reading/
>
> Recent file_fdw is available here:
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=users/hanada/postgres.git;a=summary
>
> I'll submit revised file_fdw patch after removing IsForeignTable()
> catalog lookup along Heikki's proposal.

So I'm a bit confused. I don't see the actual copy API change patch
anywhere here. Are we close to getting something committed there?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2011-02-08 14:00:27 Re: Named restore points
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-02-08 13:48:08 Re: [pgsql-general 2011-1-21:] Are there any projects interested in object functionality? (+ rule bases)