Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either

From: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either
Date: 2010-12-27 03:44:40
Message-ID: AANLkTin-KTF26nkXkf9pKBa+ZHDXqmPme_9k3tL4XUot@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:13, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Could we get away with something as simple as "requested operation is
> not supported for <plural-form-of-object-type>"?

+1. If so, will we have a function to get object names something like
GetPluralFormOfObjectType(Relation rel or char relkind) => char *  ?

> But that breaks our guideline about assembling
> translatable strings from small pieces.  Maybe it'd be OK if the piece
> is just a fragment of SQL syntax, though - not sure.

Agreed. <requested-operation> should be a SQL syntax,
so we won't have to translate the part.

-- 
Itagaki Takahiro

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-12-27 03:55:44
Subject: Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2010-12-27 03:33:15
Subject: Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group