On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Jochen Erwied <
> Thursday, July 8, 2010, 9:18:20 PM you wrote:
> > However, I just verified with the hosting company that BBU is off on the
> > raid controller. I am trying to find out my options, turn it on,
> > card, etc...
> Turning it on requires the external BBU to be installed, so even if a 9650
> has BBU support, it requires the hardware on a pluggable card.
> And even If the BBU is present, it requires to pass the selftest once until
> you are able to turn on write caching.
> Jochen Erwied | home: jochen(at)erwied(dot)eu +49-208-38800-18, FAX:
> Sauerbruchstr. 17 | work: joe(at)mbs-software(dot)de +49-2151-7294-24, FAX:
> D-45470 Muelheim | mobile: jochen(dot)erwied(at)vodafone(dot)de
One thing I don't understand is why BBU will result in a huge performance
gain. I thought BBU was all about power failures?
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Ben Chobot||Date: 2010-07-08 19:40:30|
|Subject: Re: performance on new linux box|
|Previous:||From: Richard Yen||Date: 2010-07-08 19:34:19|
|Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] WAL partition overloaded--by autovacuum? |