Re: comment needs to be updated for HS?

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: comment needs to be updated for HS?
Date: 2010-05-13 01:59:07
Message-ID: AANLkTimr9g3QNq1T0d-HwvaJl_krFSoZaESZkAm9rj6k@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 4:20 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> postmaster.c contains the following comment just above the definition
> of PMState.  It appears to be out of date:
>
>  * After reaching a consistent point in WAL redo, startup process signals
>  * us again, and we switch to PM_RECOVERY_CONSISTENT state. There's currently
>  * no difference between PM_RECOVERY and PM_RECOVERY_CONSISTENT, but we
>  * could start accepting connections to perform read-only queries at this
>  * point, if we had the infrastructure to do that.

But the first sentence of the above seems to be correct and helpful. No?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-05-13 02:03:13 Re: multibyte charater set in levenshtein function
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2010-05-13 01:49:15 Re: weird hang while running in HS mode