Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Obsolete description in pg_ctl-ref.sgml

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Obsolete description in pg_ctl-ref.sgml
Date: 2010-12-11 04:27:36
Message-ID: AANLkTimoOFAN+akgYcmXuHiPSFjtvFCjWrKRrcEb966f@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I found some obsolete descriptions in pg_ctl-ref.sgml.
> Could you apply the attached patch?

I'm just as happy to retain "saves and reuses" vs. just "reuses", but
the rest of this looks right, so committed.

>> Notes
>>
>> Waiting for complete startup is not a well-defined operation and
>> might fail if access control is set up so that a local client cannot
>> connect without manual interaction (e.g., password authentication).
>> For additional connection variables, see Section 31.13, and for
>> passwords, also see Section 31.14.
>
> The above also seems to be obsolete, thanks to recently-introduced
> PQping. Can we remove that?

Should we remove only the first sentence and keep the second one, or
is it more appropriate to remove the whole thing?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2010-12-13 04:21:51
Subject: Re: Obsolete description in pg_ctl-ref.sgml
Previous:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2010-12-09 11:45:23
Subject: Obsolete description in pg_ctl-ref.sgml

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group