Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Comparing Enumerated Types between JDBC and ODBC drivers

From: Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-jdbc <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-odbc <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Comparing Enumerated Types between JDBC and ODBC drivers
Date: 2010-12-21 18:14:18
Message-ID: AANLkTimkLoSgPSwssXcEtdk1kPz7XCyBMpt2-pergY84@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbcpgsql-odbc
While testing the waters of porting a MS-Access application to OObase.
 I noticed that certain types such as Enumerated types - as well as
other types (i.e. interval), where not representable in OObase using
the JDBC driver.   However, when I used the ODBC driver for OOBase all
such types were once again representable (they were represented as
text).

Is this an issues with OOBase or an issue with the representation of
complex types using the JDBC driver?

-- 
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.

Responses

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Adrian KlaverDate: 2010-12-21 19:10:41
Subject: Re: pgsqlodbc 09_00_0200 is twice as slow on inserts as jdbc driver
Previous:From: Andriy RysinDate: 2010-12-21 17:29:27
Subject: pgsqlodbc 09_00_0200 is twice as slow on inserts as jdbc driver

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Radosław SmoguraDate: 2010-12-22 14:11:08
Subject: Re: Comparing Enumerated Types between JDBC and ODBC drivers
Previous:From: Rajesh SundarDate: 2010-12-21 11:33:23
Subject: DBLink delete record in other database

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group