Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: git: uh-oh

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Haggerty <mhagger(at)alum(dot)mit(dot)edu>, Max Bowsher <maxb(at)f2s(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: git: uh-oh
Date: 2010-09-02 03:13:30
Message-ID: AANLkTimjhoeO8QukaqG-Oo-GVoD76C-ALDjGYy1T38QH@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> That definitely didn't fix it, although I'm not quite sure why.  Can
>> you throw the modified CVS you ran this off of up somewhere I can
>> rsync it?
>
> no rsync server on that box, but I put up a tarball for you at
> http://www.hagander.net/pgsql/cvsrepo.tgz

OK, color me baffled.  I looked at gram.c and I believe you obsoleted
the right revs. The only difference I see between this and some other
random deleted file is that it has a couple of tags pointing to revs
that don't exist any more, but I can't see how that would cause the
observed weirdness.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: KaiGai KoheiDate: 2010-09-02 03:25:36
Subject: Re: leaky views, yet again
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-09-02 03:00:39
Subject: Re: Rewrite, normal execution vs. EXPLAIN ANALYZE

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group