Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Re: git: uh-oh
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote: >> That definitely didn't fix it, although I'm not quite sure why. Can >> you throw the modified CVS you ran this off of up somewhere I can >> rsync it? > > no rsync server on that box, but I put up a tarball for you at > http://www.hagander.net/pgsql/cvsrepo.tgz OK, color me baffled. I looked at gram.c and I believe you obsoleted the right revs. The only difference I see between this and some other random deleted file is that it has a couple of tags pointing to revs that don't exist any more, but I can't see how that would cause the observed weirdness. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
In response to
- Re: git: uh-oh at 2010-09-01 10:39:35 from Magnus Hagander
Responses
- Re: git: uh-oh at 2010-09-02 08:01:09 from Magnus Hagander
- Re: git: uh-oh at 2010-09-02 12:13:28 from Michael Haggerty
pgsql-hackers by date
Next: From: KaiGai Kohei Date: 2010-09-02 03:25:36 Subject: Re: leaky views, yet again Previous: From: Robert Haas Date: 2010-09-02 03:00:39 Subject: Re: Rewrite, normal execution vs. EXPLAIN ANALYZE