On 15 June 2010 19:50, Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I did a quick google search and came up with the following document:
> I think that it helps to explain part of the issue your seeing.
Thanks, the document helps in understand how JET interprets database
types. But it does not mention anything about defaulting to scale of 6
if scale is not specified for numeric types, so I'm still unsure who
is to blame for this behaviour.
In response to
pgsql-odbc by date
|Next:||From: Jaime Casanova||Date: 2010-06-16 17:18:37|
|Subject: Re: memory leak in psqlodb 08.04.0200|
|Previous:||From: Richard Broersma||Date: 2010-06-16 02:50:28|
|Subject: Re: Wrong scale for numeric data types in MS Access and ADODB|