| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Continuent & pgsql-announce ... please do not approve |
| Date: | 2010-07-29 20:32:57 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimi0Foskbhn81g=FDvdX9+ijnqbAosr=Howr0i6@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> .Org is not the weight behind your SPAM complaints. You will need a
>> different bully against that foe.
>
> I think JD has this one right. There may or may not be a reason to
> ban Continuent (or anyone else) from our mailing lists, but the fact
> that they've sent spam to David Fetter in his personal capacity is not
> it.
+1
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2010-07-29 20:36:48 | Re: Continuent & pgsql-announce ... please do not approve |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-07-29 20:30:05 | Re: Continuent & pgsql-announce ... please do not approve |