Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Email notification pgAgent

From: Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Email notification pgAgent
Date: 2010-12-27 09:46:05
Message-ID: AANLkTimh8rkKBbqH9dcXJJugzZap_2_9uZ5GFM8YE8Xm@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
Hi Dave,

P3 is a good idea.
I think the best way to configure notifications is on a per job level. So I
need two fields in the pga_job table:

alter table pgagent.pga_job add column jobmailnotkind varchar(7) check
(jobmailnotkind in ('Success','Failure','Both'));
alter table pgagent.pga_job add column jobmailnotrecp varchar(320);

The SMTP server address is going to be an optional cl-argument (-s).

If this is going into a release. Can I assume that the fields are present,
even if pgagent is compiled without mail notification?
Background: I think, it would be inefficient to perform an extra select
between #ifdef MAIL_NOTIFICATION and #endif, so I would change this
statement in the Job::Execute() method.
"select * from pgagent.pga_jobstep
where jstenabled and jstjobid = ?
order by jstname, jstid"
to
"select js.*, j.jobmailnotkind, j.jobmailnotrecp from pgagent.pga_jobstep js
inner join pgagent.pga_job j on js.jstjobid = j.jobid
where js.jstenabled and js.jstjobid = ?
order by js.jstname, js.jstid"

Maybe, my questions seems to be silly, sorry for that. It's my first try to
contribute to an open source project.

Jasmin



2010/12/27 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>

> Hi
>
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Jasmin Dizdarevic
> <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > we've just decided to use pgAgent in our company, so I set it up and
> > discovered that there is no email notification support on failures.
> > I've decided to add this functionality, but I have some questions:
> > 1. Have there been any plans to add mail notification in the past?
>
> No.
>
> > 2. Is the feature desirable?
>
> It seems like a reasonable addition.
>
> > 3. I'm absolutely new to wxwidgets: Is wxSMTP a good idea?
> > (http://wiki.wxwidgets.org/WxSMTP)
>
> That seems like a good way forward, though to reduce the requirements
> on users who don't need it, the email feature should really be made
> optional, so if the user doesn't want it, they don't need the
> additional module to build pgAgent.
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

In response to

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-12-27 10:46:57
Subject: Re: Email notification pgAgent
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-12-27 07:21:18
Subject: Re: utffile symbol defined is strange.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group