Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, fazool mein <fazoolmein(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry
Date: 2010-09-01 00:34:31
Message-ID: AANLkTimgFdpO_BC06z30HcLRf_esmfoALq5ewTy1Fh5V@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:24 PM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 05:44:15PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> fazool mein wrote:
>> > Hello everyone,
>> >
>> > I'm interested in benchmarking synchronous replication, to see how
>> > performance degrades compared to asynchronous streaming replication.
>> >
>> > I browsed through the archive of emails, but things still seem unclear. Do
>> > we have a final agreed upon patch that I can use? Any links for that?
>>
>> No.
>
> That was a mite brusque and not super informative.
>
> There are patches, and the latest from Fujii Masao is probably worth
> looking at :)

I am pretty sure, however, that the performance will be terrible at
this point.  Heikki is working on fixing that, but it ain't done yet.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-09-01 00:35:47
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-09-01 00:33:31
Subject: Re: git: uh-oh

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group