Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility
Date: 2011-01-02 09:36:35
Message-ID: AANLkTimcmJdqDR5GSOh-iWAkUZkE+7M1mojY7iRF=RU3@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 19:49, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> We can be held responsible for the packaging decisions if they use
>> *our* "make install" commands, imho.
>
> Yep.

So, as I see it there are two ways of doing it - install a
catversion.h file and include it from libpq-fe.h, or modify the
libpq-fe.h. I still think modifying libpq-fe.h is the better of these
choices - but either of them would work. But is the catversion value
really the best interface for the user? This is about libpq
functionality level, which really has nothing to do with the backend
catalog, does it?


-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2011-01-02 10:39:45
Subject: Re: Sync Rep Design
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-01-02 09:29:27
Subject: Re: management of large patches

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group