On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 19:54, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> On 12/12/2010 01:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> (Hm, I wonder whether BCC defines them either...)
>
>> Is anyone building the client stuff with BCC any more? I don't recall
>> having heard of anyone doing so for quite some years.
>
> It's a fair question. We could clean up some of these messy ifdefs
> if we dropped support for that combination. I assume that an MSVC-built
> libpq.dll would still work for Borland users, no?
The dynamic one, yes. Static linked one, no.
IIRC I suggest desupporting it every now and then and get voted down
;) And quite often we have someone showing up around the x.y.2 release
to clean it up so it works again...
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Tom Lane | Date: 2010-12-12 19:15:18 |
| Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make S_IRGRP etc available in mingw builds as well as MSVC. |
| Previous: | From: Tom Lane | Date: 2010-12-12 18:54:18 |
| Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make S_IRGRP etc available in mingw builds as well as MSVC. |
pgsql-committers by date
| Next: | From: Tom Lane | Date: 2010-12-12 19:15:18 |
| Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make S_IRGRP etc available in mingw builds as well as MSVC. |
| Previous: | From: Tom Lane | Date: 2010-12-12 18:54:18 |
| Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make S_IRGRP etc available in mingw builds as well as MSVC. |