Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: timestamp of the last replayed transaction

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: timestamp of the last replayed transaction
Date: 2010-11-04 01:27:33
Message-ID: AANLkTimYnzF5vU=cZgmZU7a61UmmaREM4Z6u39BCF5OR@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
<dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> After 9.0 release, I've often heard that some people want to know
>> how far transactions have been replayed in the standby in timestamp
>> rather than LSN. So I'm thinking to include the function which returns
>> the timestamp of the last applied transaction (i.e., commit/abort WAL
>> record) in the core.
>>
>> Name: pg_last_replay_xact_timestamp (better name?)
>> Return Type: timestamp with time zone
>>
>> Thought?
>
> How do you want to implement the tracking?

I'm thinking to just expose GetLatestXTime(), i.e., XLogCtl->recoveryLastXTime.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Itagaki TakahiroDate: 2010-11-04 01:45:14
Subject: Re: Comparison with "true" in source code
Previous:From: Dimitri FontaineDate: 2010-11-03 21:32:25
Subject: Re: ALTER OBJECT any_name SET SCHEMA name

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group