Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Recovery bug

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Recovery bug
Date: 2010-10-19 08:31:07
Message-ID: AANLkTimYZr2XzBcAHfzdXFSdx8-7VqE5gwY+uAq+b5GW@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On 19.10.2010 08:51, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Jeff Davis<pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Do users have any expectation that they can restore a backup without
>>>>> using recovery.conf by merely having the WAL segments in pg_xlog?
>>>>
>>>> I would expect that to work.
>>
>> What's the use case?
>
> Creating a stand-alone backup tarball that contains both the base backup and
> all WAL files required to restore.

Oh, I had forgotten that case. Thanks. I'd drop my proposal.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-10-19 09:26:48
Subject: Re: Recovery bug
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-10-19 08:18:39
Subject: Re: Recovery bug

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group