Re: Help with User-defined function in PostgreSQL with Visual C++

From: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Esteban Zimanyi <estebanzimanyi(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Help with User-defined function in PostgreSQL with Visual C++
Date: 2010-09-28 03:09:05
Message-ID: AANLkTimXnFFKCj7DAV=Z43BYqfVFDR52-E6bN8AF_-M_@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Since we have PGDLLEXPORT in 9.0, we can mark some of exported
>> functions with it in tutorial codes and maybe contrib modules.
>
> If that (a) works and (b) reduces user confusion, +1 from me.  We've
> gotten this question a few times lately.

If we do so, many PGDLLEXPORT will be added:
* 17 in src/tutorial
* 507 in contrib
for each exported PGFunction, _PG_init, and _PG_fini.

Any objections? Am I missing something?

--
Itagaki Takahiro

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-09-28 03:12:05 Re: Help with User-defined function in PostgreSQL with Visual C++
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-09-28 03:06:29 Re: Hot Standby tuning for btree_xlog_vacuum()