| From: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Radosław Smogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, david(at)fetter(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al. |
| Date: | 2010-11-22 06:37:31 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimUKew96DEmZcUwwxFEXPR2fq5FXzfT5t42_+4L@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 03:40, Radosław Smogura
<rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu> wrote:
>> Regarding JDBC in the CF process -- other interfaces are handled
>> there. I haven't seen one patch this size for JDBC since I've been
>> involved, let alone two competing patches to implement the same
>> feature. Small patches which can be quickly handled don't make sense
>> to put into the process, but it seemed reasonable for these.
>
> In any way I'm sending this patch, and I will put this under Miscellaneous in
> CF. This cleared patch takes only 47k (in uncleared was some binary read
> classes) and about 50% it's big test case.
I changed the patch's topic to "JDBC".
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=399
Patch reviewers are still wanted.
--
Itagaki Takahiro
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2010-11-22 09:36:01 | Re: Extensions, this time with a patch |
| Previous Message | Rob Wultsch | 2010-11-22 05:08:59 | Re: Re: Mailing list archives |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Radosław Smogura | 2010-11-22 09:45:43 | TypeInfoCache.getPGArrayElement - determine if array |
| Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2010-11-21 22:44:56 | getTables() doesn't handle umlauts correctly |