On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Well, they need to be put back in the same location on the other
> machine (slave in case of replication, tarball otherwise). If I just
> traverse the symlinks, they'll just appears as a subdirectory of
> pg_tblspc on the other machine, won't they?

Sure, I guess you'd need to read the links if you want it to work that way.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

• Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender at 2011-01-03 15:42:35 from Magnus Hagander

Responses

• Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender at 2011-01-03 16:14:26 from Tom Lane
• Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender at 2011-01-03 16:17:58 from Stephen Frost

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Stephen Frost	Date: 2011-01-03 15:56:27
	Subject: Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2011-01-03 15:50:11
	Subject: Re: Scanning pg_tablespace from walsender