Re: contrib: auth_delay module

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: contrib: auth_delay module
Date: 2010-11-17 02:41:37
Message-ID: AANLkTimTUZ0mpF56faFZnZdoDvS=GgfJ-_dqHRaArSF9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:15 PM, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:
> If we don't need a PoC module for each new hooks, I'm not strongly
> motivated to push it into contrib tree.
> How about your opinion?

I'd say let it go, unless someone else feels strongly about it.

> Sorry, I missed the manner of contrib modules.
> It seems to me the dummy_seclabel module also lacks these documentation
> updates, although its purpose is regression testing.

Ah, we should probably fix that.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Forno 2010-11-17 05:01:57 Adding nullable indicator to Describe
Previous Message Shigeru HANADA 2010-11-17 02:10:16 Re: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival?