Re: Additional index entries and table sorting

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Additional index entries and table sorting
Date: 2010-10-04 08:24:49
Message-ID: AANLkTimRNfHfZP4Lt7-s1C4xoQCJcGOyyJkWKuHdxtP9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On 26 September 2010 18:07, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> On 26 September 2010 17:49, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> I attach a patch which adds all functions (or at least the ones I
>> found) into the index so that they can be easily located.  Previously
>> there were no entries for most of these at all in the index.  I also
>> removed the entries for count, max, min and sum in the tutorial area
>> as per this discussion:
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2010-09/msg00119.php .
>> These are no indexed on the aggregate function page.
>>
>> While I was updating the functions section, I also alphabetised any
>> unsorted function tables.
>
> I don't think my email reached the list, so reattaching a gzipped version.

Is this on the radar? Copying in -hackers in case.

--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-10-04 17:32:34 Re: Additional index entries and table sorting
Previous Message Greg Smith 2010-09-30 23:58:36 Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Tiikkaja 2010-10-04 09:28:05 Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies
Previous Message Itagaki Takahiro 2010-10-04 08:17:06 Re: patch: psql variables tabcomplete