On 26 September 2010 18:07, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> On 26 September 2010 17:49, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> I attach a patch which adds all functions (or at least the ones I
>> found) into the index so that they can be easily located. Previously
>> there were no entries for most of these at all in the index. I also
>> removed the entries for count, max, min and sum in the tutorial area
>> as per this discussion:
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2010-09/msg00119.php .
>> These are no indexed on the aggregate function page.
>> While I was updating the functions section, I also alphabetised any
>> unsorted function tables.
> I don't think my email reached the list, so reattaching a gzipped version.
Is this on the radar? Copying in -hackers in case.
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-10-04 17:32:34|
|Subject: Re: Additional index entries and table sorting|
|Previous:||From: Greg Smith||Date: 2010-09-30 23:58:36|
|Subject: Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Marko Tiikkaja||Date: 2010-10-04 09:28:05|
|Subject: Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies|
|Previous:||From: Itagaki Takahiro||Date: 2010-10-04 08:17:06|
|Subject: Re: patch: psql variables tabcomplete|