| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade patch application process, and move to /bin? |
| Date: | 2010-10-20 19:30:01 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimQu-Vb9mDoC9opxS2uKVsZNUb_gRrZAMHhvvV1@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 21:28, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> One more question --- should I be sending pg_upgrade patches to the list
>> for approval? The restructuring patch was large and didn't seem
>> necessary to post, and the speedups were tested by the bug reporter, so
>> I figured those were OK to apply.
>
> I think it would be good to do that. At least give people a chance to
> comment, if they care.
+1. It's also a good way for people to get a bit more involved in the code.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-10-20 19:32:09 | Re: pg_upgrade patch application process, and move to /bin? |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2010-10-20 19:28:25 | Re: PostgreSQL and HugePage |