Re: query execution time

From: preetika tyagi <preetikatyagi(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: query execution time
Date: 2011-03-21 18:03:04
Message-ID: AANLkTimQjE1cMGLPVDH+SNsH4A+Mwx2+_T+rQ1dJAkhV@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-students

Thank you, Scott!
I tried running the same query after reboot and back-to-back, it was taking
less time in both the cases. It means the problem is something else.

Can there be a reason which is more hardware/operating system specific and
due to which the behavior is not uniform?

Preetika

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com>wrote:

> On Mar 21, 2011, at 9:55 AM, preetika tyagi wrote:
>
> > For example, if A is 15 minutes, then B is 1.5 hrs.
>
> Well, considering that random disk access is on the order of 10,000 times
> slower than RAM...
>
> But you can answer the question yourself by comparing the query run against
> cold caches (after a reboot, or various command-line tricks to purge cache)
> vs against warm caches (twice back-to-back).
>
> --
> Scott Ribe
> scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com
> http://www.elevated-dev.com/
> (303) 722-0567 voice
>
>
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-03-21 18:45:36 Re: foreign data wrappers
Previous Message Aljoša Mohorović 2011-03-21 17:45:32 postgres conferences missing videos?

Browse pgsql-students by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-03-21 18:45:36 Re: foreign data wrappers
Previous Message Selena Deckelmann 2011-03-21 16:57:05 Re: foreign data wrappers