Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions ( correct patch attached )

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions ( correct patch attached )
Date: 2010-07-30 09:56:53
Message-ID: AANLkTimQFVgcAGtK_F-R-k4+i_M+joT0os33y6jjVcFu@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hello

2010/7/29 Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>:
> On Thu, July 29, 2010 22:43, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>> Hi Pavel,
>>
>> In xfunc.sgml, I came across a function example (for use of VARIADIC in polymorphic functions),
>> where the function name is concat():  (in the manual: 35.4.10. Polymorphic SQL Functions).
>> Although that is not strictly wrong, it seems better to change that name when concat goes into
>> core, as seems to be the plan.
>>
>> If you agree, it seems best to include this change in your patch and change that example
>> function's name when the stringfunc patch gets applied.
>>
>
> My apologies, the previous email had the wrong doc-patch attached.
>
> Here is the correct one.
>

it is good idea, thank you

Pavel

>
> Erik Rijkers
>

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Vincenzo RomanoDate: 2010-07-30 10:24:10
Subject: Re: On Scalability
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-07-30 08:07:18
Subject: Re: ERROR: argument to pg_get_expr() must come from system catalogs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group