On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Itagaki Takahiro
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> While looking at binary COPY performance I forgot to add BINARY and was a bit
>> shocked to see printf that high in the profile...
>> A change from 9192.476ms 5309.928ms seems to be pretty good indication that a
>> change in that area is waranted given integer columns are quite ubiquous...
> Good optimization. Here is the result on my machine:
> * before: 13057.190 ms, 12429.092 ms, 12622.374 ms
> * after: 8261.688 ms, 8427.024 ms, 8622.370 ms
Wow. Nice stuff, Andres!
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Itagaki Takahiro||Date: 2010-11-01 03:17:02|
|Subject: Comparison with "true" in source code|
|Previous:||From: Itagaki Takahiro||Date: 2010-11-01 03:04:51|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out
of performance reasons|