On 26 October 2010 17:04, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2010, at 7:15 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Notwithstanding the above, I don't think ELEMENT would be a very bad choice.
>> I still think we should just go for LABEL and be done with it. But
>> y'all can ignore me if you want...
Well ELEMENT is a reserved keyword in SQL:2008, to support multisets,
so if we ever supported that feature...
But I don't feel strongly about this. I think the overall consensus so
far is in favour of LABEL.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jeff Davis||Date: 2010-10-26 18:53:27|
|Subject: Re: foreign keys for array/period contains relationships|
|Previous:||From: David Fetter||Date: 2010-10-26 18:31:45|