From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PS display and standby query conflict |
Date: | 2010-12-17 13:35:16 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimO_xxS5V61r6dkNf0Fo2WfHi-wD6=4=8_-WeJ1@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> But if it annoys you, it seems OK to change it. Don't see a reason to backpatch though?
>
> I think that It's worth backpatch to prevent users who observe the
> occurrence of the query conflicts carefully for testing 9.0 from
> getting confusing.
I don't think this is important enough to back-patch, but it does seem
like a good idea in general, so committed, but just to the master
branch.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-12-17 13:36:06 | Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-12-17 13:34:32 | pgsql: Reset 'ps' display just once when resolving VXID conflicts. |