Re: ExecutorCheckPerms() hook

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ExecutorCheckPerms() hook
Date: 2010-07-09 14:07:33
Message-ID: AANLkTimO2822PplW5EiXjdm3cb5nhD26_fbXXlyaKrR6@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> As for committing it, I would definitely like to commit the actual
>> hook.  If we want the hook without the contrib module that's OK with
>> me, although I generally feel it's useful to have examples of how
>> hooks can be used, which is why I took the time to produce a working
>> example.
>
> +1 on committing the hook.  As for the contrib module, it doesn't strike
> me that there's much of a use-case for it as is.  I think it's enough
> that it's available in the -hackers archives.

OK, done that way.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-07-09 14:26:14 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp HEAD as 9.1devel.
Previous Message Kaare Rasmussen 2010-07-09 14:07:06 Listen/Notify in 9.0