On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>> At the very least, catalogs.sgml requires a fix for that.
>>> Woops. OK, will fix.
>> Based on a little grepping, that's the only thing I see. I'll push a
>> fix for that. Do you see anything else?
> My grep agrees that relistemp, per se, is only referenced in one place
> in catalogs.sgml. But are you sure that, for example, storage.sgml
> doesn't need any updates?
Hmm... <reads that chapter>
I think that this patch doesn't necessitate any updates to this
chapter. However, the main unlogged tables patch probably should
touch this chapter, and currently does not.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2010-12-13 21:25:19|
|Subject: pgsql: Translation updates for release 8.3.13|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-12-13 18:10:02|
|Subject: pgsql: Document replacement of pg_class.relistemp with relpersistence.|