Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: First stab at 9.0 release announcement

From: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, jd <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: First stab at 9.0 release announcement
Date: 2010-06-21 15:16:13
Message-ID: AANLkTimMfPYh2S9XbSy3imIjP6WRt9hYxo0f1R6q-3x3@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On 21 June 2010 16:12, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 01:34:37PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 02:42, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 17:22 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> >> > "The PostgreSQL Global Development Team is proud to announce
>> >> > the release of version 9.0. "
>> >> >
>> >> > Maybe "PostgreSQL 9.0" instead of "version 9.0"?
>> >>
>> >> Yeah, tried that too, it seemed repetitive.  You don't think so?
>> >
>> > O.k. this may not fly but:
>> >
>> > The PostgreSQL Global Development Group (that is who we are, not
>> > team) is proud to announce the release of 9.
>>
>> Can we please *not* call it 9, but stick to 9.0?
>
> Another way to deal with this would be to make the next one 10, the
> following one 11, etc., etc. :)
>

You mean we're not going to have PostgreSQL X?  Ah, but then it might
get shortened to PGX, and then we'd be in a kerfuffle. ;)

Thom

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2010-06-21 15:51:22
Subject: Re: First stab at 9.0 release announcement
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2010-06-21 15:12:52
Subject: Re: First stab at 9.0 release announcement

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group