Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include <funcapi.h>)
From:
Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Elliot Chance <elliotchance(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Subject:
Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include <funcapi.h>)
Date:
2011-01-02 22:51:13
Message-ID:
AANLkTimLW5CDDkJX=pe7_dC_463LRS5ijaz0wQQ1w-gL@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2010-12-26 03:14:40 from Elliot Chance <elliotchance(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-12-26 06:14:45 from Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
2010-12-26 08:20:33 from Elliot Chance <elliotchance(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-12-26 17:31:37 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-12-26 21:54:24 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2010-12-27 15:54:16 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2010-12-27 16:12:54 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2010-12-27 16:54:56 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-12-27 17:11:36 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2010-12-27 17:50:02 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-12-27 18:00:34 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2010-12-27 18:07:03 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-12-27 18:21:37 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-12-27 19:13:33 from Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-12-27 19:17:57 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-12-27 19:48:50 from Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-12-27 20:03:55 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2010-12-27 20:12:34 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2011-01-02 22:51:13 from Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
2011-01-13 17:32:47 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
2010-12-27 17:33:00 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2010-12-27 17:39:34 from David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
2010-12-27 17:50:45 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2010-12-30 19:27:07 from Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Lists:
pgsql-general pgsql-hackers
I believe that Dave Page wants to move to building pg for windows
using visual C++ 2010 some time this year. That alone may be enough of
a reason to check for C++0x keywords in headers:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2010/04/06/c-0x-core-language-features-in-vc10-the-table.aspx
I think that there is likely to be an expectation that the same
compiler that is used to build pg should be able to include pg headers
in C++ TUs.
--
Regards,
Peter Geoghegan
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2011-01-02 23:17:42Subject : Re: How to know killed by pg_terminate_backend Previous :From : Jim NasbyDate : 2011-01-02 22:11:25Subject : Re: contrib/snapshot
pgsql-general by date
Next :From: Adrian KlaverDate: 2011-01-02 23:06:23Subject : Re: CSV-bulk import and defaultsPrevious :From : Thomas SchmidtDate : 2011-01-02 22:22:14Subject : CSV-bulk import and defaults
