Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific
Date: 2011-02-26 11:07:37
Message-ID: AANLkTimFhNjc-CktWPUzo=otcDt8Mic6bAWOvfHHfned@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:57, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 26 February 2011 18:06, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>> Any progress on this?
>>
>
> I ended up doing most of the work, but never got around to finishing
> it off.  Thanks for the reminder, though.  I'll get that one ready and
> drop it onto the next CF.

Just as a point, which i proably moot if you've done most of the work
already :) But at some point it might be worthwhile to see if our life
would be mad easier by using flex (with or without bison) to parse
pg_hba.conf as wel, since we do it for postgresql.conf and other
things. If it makes maintenance easier, it's probably worth it.

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg StarkDate: 2011-02-26 13:31:16
Subject: Re: wCTE: why not finish sub-updates at the end, not the beginning?
Previous:From: Marko TiikkajaDate: 2011-02-26 10:48:38
Subject: Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group