Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences

From: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
To: Guillaume Cottenceau <gc(at)mnc(dot)ch>
Cc: A B <gentosaker(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences
Date: 2010-11-05 11:30:41
Message-ID: AANLkTimEJbR7zWBLx_HhJ7VkrP=ZK9Uqrs_OEqbqS0nM@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 13:11, Guillaume Cottenceau <gc(at)mnc(dot)ch> wrote:
> Don't use PostgreSQL, just drop your data, you will end up with
> the same results and be even faster than any use of PostgreSQL.
> If anyone needs data, then just say you had data corruption, and
> that since 100% dataloss is accepted, then all's well.

You're not helping. There are legitimate reasons for trading off
safety for performance.

Regards,
Marti

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message A B 2010-11-05 11:32:39 Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2010-11-05 11:27:41 Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences