On 25 August 2010 20:15, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 18 August 2010 21:53, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>>> On ons, 2010-08-18 at 16:52 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
>>>> I attach a patch to add information to the Primary Keys section
>>>> of the Constraints page. While the information already exists
>>>> on the CREATE TABLE, I don't think a brief mention on the page
>>>> specifically concerning primary keys could hurt.
>>>> So here's a patch to add it. Worth adding?
>>> <firstterm> is probably not appropriate here, because you are not
>>> defining the term for the first time.
>> That is true.
> It looks like discussion died here. Do you want to propose a new
> patch? (I'd be happy to give it a shot if you'd rather.)
Sure, go for it. :)
> In any
> event, we should probably mention this for all three constraint
> types which automatically create an index: PRIMARY KEY, UNIQUE, and
Agreed, and I didn't actually think about the fact that exclusion
constraints add indexes.
Registered Linux user: #516935
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Mariano Reingart||Date: 2010-08-25 20:04:09|
|Subject: Compiling and Linking Dynamically-Loaded Functions on Windows|
|Previous:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2010-08-25 19:15:03|
|Subject: Re: Primary Key index|