On 22 June 2010 13:43, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 06:22:52PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> On 6/18/10 5:42 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 17:22 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> >>> "The PostgreSQL Global Development Team is proud to announce the release
>> >>> of version 9.0. "
>> >>> Maybe "PostgreSQL 9.0" instead of "version 9.0"?
>> >> Yeah, tried that too, it seemed repetitive. You don't think so?
>> Well, one of the things I've thought was the following:
>> The PostgerSQL Global Development Team is proud to announce the release
>> of PostgreSQL 9.0, the 31st release of the world's leading open source
>> relational database system.
>> ... however, that seemed excessively wordy. No?
> It's approaching wordiness, but it still has my vote (minus the typo). If I'm
> in the minority on this one, however, my second choice has us using two
> The PostgreSQL Global Development Team is proud to announce the release of
> PostgreSQL 9.0. This is the 31st release of the world's leading open
> source relational database system.
Hmm... saying 31st almost sounds like it's just another normal
release. Couldn't you make it something like "This landmark version
marks the 31st release of..."
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2010-06-22 13:43:51|
|Subject: Re: First stab at 9.0 release announcement|
|Previous:||From: Greg Sabino Mullane||Date: 2010-06-22 13:08:48|
|Subject: Re: 9.0: Too many features. Help us choose!|