| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Rémi Zara <remi_zara(at)mac(dot)com>, Stefan Huehner <stefan(at)huehner(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest) |
| Date: | 2011-03-07 20:00:24 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimBW=AA1EHUpbukbSzaRAkEuPpz0TxUgW9VhcUp@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> At the risk of hijacking this thread to talk about the subject of this
>> thread, when are we going to cut alpha4?
>
> Well, a prerequisite for cutting an alpha is closing the commitfest,
> which at this point reduces to deciding what we are going to do with
> the plpython traceback patch.
>
> Other than that, I think we're pretty close.
AFAIK, there's nothing particularly special about that patch, other
than that the author chose to move it back from Returned with Feedback
to some other status. I think we should just pick a time to wrap some
time in the next day or two, and it either makes it or it doesn't.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-03-07 20:11:17 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: If recovery_target_timeline is set to 'latest' and standby mode |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-03-07 19:43:18 | Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest) |