From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Throw error for indeterminate collation of an ORDER/GROUP/DISTIN |
Date: | 2011-03-22 21:44:06 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimBCCiLW__CN8yNfHEoqAuz5zOGKU=VMXhF3awu@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Throw error for indeterminate collation of an ORDER/GROUP/DISTINCT target.
>
hmm. In the current arrangement = doesn't depend on collation, right?
So in an ideal world we could use any collation we want to implement
GROUP/DISTINCT/UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. I can see how it would be hard
to generate paths for every possible collation but it would be awfully
nice if we had a way to represent this so we could pick whichever
index we thought would be fastest instead of relying on the user to
select one.
--
greg
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-03-22 21:47:55 | Re: pgsql: Throw error for indeterminate collation of an ORDER/GROUP/DISTIN |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-03-22 21:21:06 | pgsql: Make initdb ignore locales for client-only encodings. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-03-22 21:47:55 | Re: pgsql: Throw error for indeterminate collation of an ORDER/GROUP/DISTIN |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-03-22 21:44:04 | Re: Flex output missing from 9.1a4 tarballs? |