Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Re: [HACKERS] reviewers needed!
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> wrote: > I reviewed a couple patched, and I added my review to the commitfest page. > > If I find a problem, its obvious I should mark the patch as "returned with > feedback". Only if it's got sufficiently serious flaws that getting it committed during this CommitFest is not practical. If it just needs some revision, "Waiting on Author" is the right place. > But what if I'm happy with it? I'm not a hacker so cannot do C code review, > should I leave it alone? Mark it as "ready for committer"? Yep, that's fine. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
- Re: [HACKERS] reviewers needed! at 2011-01-16 19:30:58 from Andy Colson
Responses
- Re: [HACKERS] reviewers needed! at 2011-01-26 18:21:41 from Ibrar Ahmed
pgsql-hackers by date
Next: From: Robert Haas Date: 2011-01-16 22:13:23 Subject: Re: limiting hint bit I/O Previous: From: Noah Misch Date: 2011-01-16 21:38:38 Subject: Re: ALTER TYPE 0: Introduction; test cases
pgsql-rrreviewers by date
Next: From: Richard Broersma Date: 2011-01-24 20:17:16 Subject: Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers Previous: From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira Date: 2011-01-16 21:13:30 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] reviewers needed!