2010/9/15 Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>:
> On 2010-09-14 10:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> My recollection is that whether a CTE is marked RECURSIVE or not affects
>> its scope of visibility, so that confusing the two cases can result in
>> flat-out incorrect parser behavior.
>
> The worst I can think of is:
>
> CREATE TABLE foo(a int);
>
> WITH t AS (SELECT * FROM foo)
> INSERT INTO bar
> WITH RECURSIVE foo (SELECT 1 AS a)
> SELECT * FROM t;
>
> t will actually be populated with the results of the CTE, not the table foo.

Hmmm, that's true. But it seems unrelated to RECURSIVE option, right?

Regards,



-- 
Hitoshi Harada

In response to

• Re: top-level DML under CTEs at 2010-09-14 20:28:33 from Marko Tiikkaja

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Hitoshi Harada	Date: 2010-09-15 01:15:12
	Subject: Re: top-level DML under CTEs
Previous:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2010-09-15 00:44:03
	Subject: Re: Pseudoconstant quals versus the join removal patch

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:	From: Hitoshi Harada	Date: 2010-09-15 01:15:12
	Subject: Re: top-level DML under CTEs
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2010-09-14 23:02:25
	Subject: Re: top-level DML under CTEs