Re: PROPOSAL of xmlvalidate

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomáš Pospíšil <killteck(at)seznam(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, chmelab(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL of xmlvalidate
Date: 2010-11-29 17:18:52
Message-ID: AANLkTim3xK6wSxNgPU7C71nUfnDpw8i3H7b9fd6Ltfu6@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/11/29 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Tomáš Pospíšil <killteck(at)seznam(dot)cz> wrote:
>> I have idea of creating system table for holding DTDs, XSDs, Relax-NGs (similar as on ORACLE).
>>
>> Is that good idea?
>
> I doubt it.  Why would we want to do that?

If I understand, it allows a local copy of DTD, .. so then is possible
to provide a fast DTD checking.

Regards

Pavel Stehule

>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-11-29 17:21:31 Re: pg_execute_from_file review
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-11-29 17:15:13 Re: large page query