Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Command to prune archive at restartpoints

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Command to prune archive at restartpoints
Date: 2010-06-09 01:51:59
Message-ID: AANLkTil1Q4e1-9MuFA0ZvwjC_Pvo6cheS9f9Z6_RJT62@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Takahiro Itagaki
<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> > Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> >> I prefer archive_cleanup_command. We should name things after their
>> >> principal function, not an implementation detail, IMNSHO.
>> >
>> > Weak preference for archive_cleanup_command here.
>>
>> OK, sounds like we have consensus on that.  Who wants to do it?
>
> Do we just need to replace all of them? If so, patch attached.
> I replaced 3 terms: recovery_end_command, recovery-end-command,
> and recoveryEndCommand.

I think we're replacing restartpoint_command, not recovery_end_command.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2010-06-09 02:00:41
Subject: Re: Command to prune archive at restartpoints
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-06-09 01:51:00
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Invalid YAML output from EXPLAIN

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group