Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: shared_buffers advice

From: Konrad Garus <konrad(dot)garus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: shared_buffers advice
Date: 2010-05-28 07:57:40
Message-ID: AANLkTikzydJP_lGTtPN0nD-O35siBnPbPOtxJSRU0UgV@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
2010/5/27 Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> Exactly. And the time to browse depend on the number of blocks already
> in core memory.
> I am interested by tests results and benchmarks if you are going to do some :)

I am still thinking whether I want to do it on this prod machine.
Maybe on something less critical first (but still with a good amount
of memory mapped by page buffers).

What system have you tested it on? Has it ever run on a few-gig system? :-)

-- 
Konrad Garus

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Cédric VillemainDate: 2010-05-28 08:12:52
Subject: Re: shared_buffers advice
Previous:From: 黄永卫Date: 2010-05-28 04:11:31
Subject: 答复: [PERFORM] About Tom Lane's Xeon CS

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group