On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> > I have been away from Postgres development for quite a while, so would
>> > appreciate if someone could tell me if such a patch should be submitted
>> > for
>> > commitfest (since this is not actually a source patch).
>> By all means add it to the open CF.
> When trying to submit new patch, the 'CommitFest' drop-down has just one
> entry '(None Selected)', and 'Submit' would refuse to go through without a
Oh, blah. I just added a Miscellaneous topic. You can add others
yourself, just look on the CF page for "CommitFest topics".
> What should be the value of 'Message-ID for original patch' ?
> the URL: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-09/msg01837.php
> or the ID: AANLkTinw0HL+jQmrtwXC9Y2tqhcfHFgFekxyyfYGvQrB(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2010-09-27 14:15:37|
|Subject: Re: Improving prep_buildtree used in VPATH builds|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-09-27 14:10:20|
|Subject: Re: forming tuple as an attribute inside another tuple in c function|