On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 19:12 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> >> Hmm, OK, I think that makes sense. Would you care to propose a patch?
>> > Yep. Here is the patch.
>> > This patch distinguishes normal shutdown from unexpected exit, while the
>> > server is in recovery. That is, when smart or fast shutdown is requested
>> > during recovery, the bgwriter sets the ControlFile->state to new-introduced
>> > DB_SHUTDOWNED_IN_RECOVERY state.
>> This patch is worth applying for 9.0? If not, I'll add it into
>> the next CF for 9.1.
> Presumably Robert will be applying the patch? It seems to address the
> concern raised on the thread.
Yes, I was planning to review it. But if you or someone else would
like to cut in, that's OK too.
The Enterprise Postgres Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-05-25 16:40:59|
|Subject: Re: Synchronization levels in SR|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2010-05-25 16:36:42|
|Subject: Re: recovery getting interrupted is not so unusual as it
used to be|