So Kris you are obviously aware of the issue. Who do i need to talk to or is
there someone on here that can confirm if it is possible to get this
included in the driver?
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Jason Tesser <jasontesser(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Right in my case my schema changes as each organization has a separate
> I would love to be able to set the schema with the typeName. Why couldn't
> that be a seperate attribute in Java setLookupSchema and if not set function
> as it does now. Wouldn't this handle both cases.
> While I know I am using an outside case I do think it is a valid one.
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Jason Tesser wrote:
>> The issue with teh driver is that when you use a composite type as an
>>> parameter of a STored Proc teh Driver queries the pg_catalog but from
>>> what I
>>> can tell has no way of telling what schema to query for.
>> Right, the JDBC driver's internal knowledge of types has no information
>> about schemas or the search path. It currently assumes the name alone is a
>> unique identifier. Fixing this to respect the search path wouldn't be that
>> tough by using the regtype type, but we want to cache this information to
>> avoid repeated type lookups, so it wouldn't change as the search_path
>> changed. The other approach to fixing things would be to allow the user to
>> specify the schema with the type name, but I don't think people want to do
>> that because the schema may not be known to the application.
>> Kris Jurka
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Kris Jurka||Date: 2010-06-02 10:03:30|
|Subject: Re: Found a Bug in latest Driver (I THINK) and pg 8.4|
|Previous:||From: Craig Ringer||Date: 2010-06-02 06:02:49|
|Subject: Re: jdbc works in java app, fails in servlet: "no suitable